Viewpoint Software Review: Concord Companies
User Review
EricPeterson
Review Summary
Concord Companies Inc., a commercial general contractor and construction management firm, saved about $500,000 a year when it purchased Viewpoint construction software, and the Arizona-based business predicts even greater savings in the future.
"It paid for itself in the first two years and, leveraging for future growth, will be the biggest pay-off, dollar-wise," said Eric Peterson, chief financial officer at Concord. "We paid, plus or minus, $175,000 for the software, $100,000 for the hardware and network and $50,000 for consulting and report development. We have saved two support salaries of $100,000 per year. We have the ability to save 0.5 percent, or $300,000 a year."
The software's integration of accounting and project management eliminated redundant tasks, thereby improving efficiency and accuracy and enhancing the amount and depth of data available to management.
Today, Concord is using an earlier version of Viewpoint construction software and was slightly dissatisfied with only a few aspects, such as the user interface. The vendor addressed that concern when it developed V6, which is scheduled to ship to users as part of a free software service package early this year, according to a Viewpoint spokesman.
"We plan to do an upgrade of procedures, manuals and training to take advantage of the improvements in V6. We also plan to finish work in areas we stopped working on because the team was tired of implementing," said Peterson.
Peterson gave Viewpoint a 9 out of 10 rating. If Viewpoint's new version improves the remote user experience and makes a more intuitive desktop, it will be a 10, he noted.
Full Review
Three years.
We build schools, churches, government buildings, commercial offices and medical offices.
We bought it directly from Viewpoint.
We paid, plus or minus, $175,000 for the software, $100,000 for the hardware and network and $50,000 for consulting and report development.
We use Viewpoint construction software for all of our accounting including general ledger, accounts payable, accounts receivable, EQ, CM, job-costing and financials. Only works-in-progress and analysis are done outside Viewpoint. All project management, including workflow management, is done in Viewpoint, and so is job-cost management. We do not use Viewpoint for scheduling.
We had many reasons for selecting Viewpoint construction software. It has a strong accounting system, allows multiple periods to be open and features integrated project management. Viewpoint has a reputation for solid systems and great support, and the company understands construction and general contractors. In addition, it features or supports a SQL database, Microsoft development tools, Crystal reports, notifier and built-in scanning and attachments. It also has a user database that is easy to customize without a programmer on-hand.
The software is scaleable, supporting companies from $35 million to more than $500 million in revenue. It is a system around which you can build an enterprise system.
We looked at Timberline, Prolog, Constructware and custom-written applications. Only Viewpoint and Timberline had the scope and integration we required. Viewpoint -- its database and its program -- is more stable and faster, as well as more flexible because of its customization tools. Viewpoint construction software is very predictable and reliable vs. Timberline and its network of value-added resellers. Likewise, Viewpoint's data is always solid. It's a great backbone system.
Our integration of accounting and operations is vastly improved, and we use much less paper and have much less redundant work. In fact, we can do more work with less staff. Our project management and firm management have much, much better information available to manage. We feel our systems can support whatever growth we choose to pursue, with no constraints.
All our projects have clean buy-out and team-cost and documentation reviews. Since the team uses the same system there is no disagreement over whether the data is valid. We do not lose sight of issues, changes and other things that cause profit fade. Implementing an integrated solution along with reengineering our company around it has been transformational. When we need to press owners to get paid for changes issues, we have the information.
We have saved two support salaries of $100,000 per year. We have the ability to save 0.5 percent -- or $300,000 a year. It paid for itself in the first two years and leveraging for future growth will be the biggest pay-off, dollar-wise.
The integration of accounting and project-management, as well as the customization tools for the user database, Crystal, etc. We can track issues across the entire project management system. The consistent look helps with training.
Very much so.
Viewpoint could make it look 'prettier,' so to speak, with a more web-like feel. We'd like to see better out-of-the box reports on the project management side that would require less customization. We'd also like an easier way for casual users, such as field workers and business owners, to get their programs, and we would like better Web tools.
We do not use payroll and human resources because we use Paychex. Nor do we use the desktop faxing, because it does not work yet. Some of the project management applications, including testing logs, are not applicable to our business.
General contractors, construction managements and midsize to large subcontractors. It would be a strong candidate for a self-performing contractor, but also great for construction managers, multi-office or multi-state firms, as well as growing businesses.
Limited experience is needed for basic Viewpoint construction software users. Implementation and customization require some software experience or willingness to learn via support and hands-on experience. The IT environment needs a good network, SQL or Citrix firm. We don't have an in-house IT team; we have one-third time total outsourced IT support plus VP power users in departments and offices.
Yes, but it was worth it. We sent five or so people to VP training in Oregon and spent a couple of months using a test company to learn how to set up and properly use the software. We did weekly training -- an hour on Friday -- for months for various users. New people are now trained by others because all employees are trained on a common system and procedures.
Yes, they are great. Viewpoint's support is always quick to respond and competent. They are always friendly and have specialists in areas when needed. VPs can log in remotely and look at our system when necessary.
We used it during the implementation, but developed our own operations and accounting manuals. We use online help very often, and find it very helpful.
Yes. We plan to do an upgrade of procedures, manuals and training to take advantage of the improvements in V6. We also plan to finish work in areas we stopped working on because the team was tired of implementing.
9
Find Software Tips
Latest reviews by topic
- Field Management (2)
- Imaging (6)
- Risk Analysis (3)
- Cost Estimating (37)
- CRM (8)
- Engineering/CAD (14)
- Job Cost Accounting (47)
- On Screen Takeoff (10)
- Project Management (81)
- Scheduling and Resourcing (50)
Latest reviews by industry
- Commercial (81)
- Concrete (37)
- Design/Build Firm (40)
- Electrical Contractor (41)
- Energy (Oil/Gas) (30)
- General Contracting (76)
- Government (56)
- Healthcare (35)
- Heavy and Highway (71)
- Industrial (76)
- Insurance (20)
- Landscape (24)
- Masonry (24)
- Mechanical Contractor (25)
- Mixed Use (70)
- New Construction (37)
- Plumbing Contractor (29)
- Repair/Remodeling (41)
- Residential (82)
- School (34)
- Subcontractor (39)
- Utilities (31)