Meridian Prolog Software Review: SNC Lavalin
User Review
Utpala Dubey
Review Summary
Meridian Prolog project management software's out-of-the-box performance needed a lot of customization in order to meet the requirements of SNC Lavalin Thermal Power, a full-service, turnkey engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) company. Even after all the hours and dollars spent on customization, the Prolog-based solution -- which is used for progress-measurement, cost and commitments and forecasting -- must be combined with a spreadsheet in order to deliver full results. "Only after we exported data to Microsoft Excel were we able to develop more detailed analysis on commitments and forecasting," said Utpala Dubey of SNC Lavalin Thermal.
Despite the difficult customization, Dubey admits that Meridian Prolog allowed the Bothell, Washington-based company, which constructs natural gas-fired power plants, to centralize its progress measurement, cost, commitments and forecasting into one software program, rather than multiple programs. This saved the business money on software, training and support while improved efficiency and accuracy.
"I think the software's integration with payroll for cost commitments, budgeting, tracking costs and commitments, and uploading variances to budgets, is very useful and efficient," Dubey said.
Dubey rated Meridian Prolog, without his company's customizations, as 6 out of 10.
Full Review
I used it for five years at SNC Lavalin.
SNC Lavalin Thermal Power is a full-service, turnkey engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) company. I primarily work on natural gas-fired power plants.
It was provided to me by the company.
I didn't buy this product, and so I don't know.
I use Meridian Prolog for progress-measurement, cost and commitments, and forecasting.
I had no role in the selection process as it was provided when I worked at SNC Lavalin.
No, I didn't look at other tools because the software was already in place.
Before Prolog, we tracked a project's progress on an access-based program called Ledger. Essentially, all Meridian Prolog did for my company was to combine progress-measurement, cost and commitments, and forecasting into one software, rather than into multiple programs.
No, because Meridian Prolog was used on all SNC Lavalin Thermal Power projects.
I cannot say. Since SNC Lavalin used this for all its projects, there's no way to determine this figure.
I think the software's integration with payroll for cost commitments, budgeting, tracking costs and commitments, and uploading variances to budgets, is very useful and efficient.
I don't know how much money my company paid, but Prolog definitely requires a lot of additional work, so I'm not sure it is worth the price.
I would add contract modules, back-charges, trends and more. Also, considering the size of the projects SNC Lavalin was executing, progress-entry for construction wasn't easy. It was very tedious to enter progress, for example on every spool. It would have saved many man-hours and an additional person only if there was a way to batch-upload the progress through an Excel spreadsheet or CSV file. Also reports are not modifiable once they have been customized. We lived with truncated numbers and got around it by exporting the data back to Excel and then analyzing it.
I don't use document/drawing transmittals and contracts modules. In fact, I don't think my company paid for contracts modules, and our document controls team does document-tracking using their own, existing tools.
I think every engineering, procurement and construction company, manufacturing company or businesses in any industry that needs some tool for tracking progress, cost and commitments, or transmittals should look at this product. In the absence of any other options, this certainly is a good product.
Anyone comfortable with standard Microsoft applications will definitely need full-time training for at least a week or so to understand the usage of all modules and reports.
I did not receive formal training for this software, although a formal training program would have made the job easier. I basically learned it hands-on, and by asking colleagues when they had time.
I hardly called. Instead, we called in our consultant who had customized this software.
I didn't use it much. With all the customization our company had done, all the vendor's documentation that was readily available was pretty much useless.
I don't think so.
6, without customizations.
Find Software Tips
Latest reviews by topic
- Field Management (2)
- Imaging (5)
- Risk Analysis (3)
- Cost Estimating (34)
- CRM (7)
- Engineering/CAD (13)
- Job Cost Accounting (44)
- On Screen Takeoff (10)
- Project Management (76)
- Scheduling and Resourcing (49)
Latest reviews by industry
- Commercial (78)
- Concrete (37)
- Design/Build Firm (39)
- Electrical Contractor (40)
- Energy (Oil/Gas) (28)
- General Contracting (74)
- Government (54)
- Healthcare (35)
- Heavy and Highway (69)
- Industrial (73)
- Insurance (20)
- Landscape (24)
- Masonry (24)
- Mechanical Contractor (24)
- Mixed Use (68)
- New Construction (37)
- Plumbing Contractor (28)
- Repair/Remodeling (41)
- Residential (78)
- School (34)
- Subcontractor (39)
- Utilities (29)
