Primavera P3 Software Review: Suncor Energy
User Review
Salvador Carlos Hernandez Ramirez
Review Summary
Without the proper tool, complex construction scheduling can be an unmanageable nightmare. Not so at Suncor Energy, where about 300 employees use Primavera Project Planner (P3) each day.
This construction scheduling software, which Suncor bought for $2,500, was more expensive than its competitors and required customization in allowing cost-allocation at the Activity ID level. However, it was well worth the extra dollars and efforts, said Salvador Carlos Hernandez Ramirez, who has worked at the Calgary-based company for two years and who has used Primavera software for seven years.
"In my last project, a combined cycle power plant, we grew from 800 activities, while the basic engineering phase was being executed, to more than 6,000 activities during startup and commissioning," Hernandez Ramirez said. "It was always the same project and P3 managed it as such, allowing schedulers to add detail and activities as information became available."
Using P3, schedulers can break complex projects into bite-size increments and then easily integrate each piece into the full project, he said. This reduces the time spent, increases efficiency and accuracy, and enables a company to allocate construction scheduling tasks to the most appropriate personnel or department. Standardized layouts make it easier for people to learn and use, speeding up training time and reducing mistakes, Hernandez Ramirez noted.
Since training, too, is often broken down into tiers, most users need only attend tier one and two classes, he said. The third session is more advanced, addressing global changes and some programming issues typically not of concern to most schedulers, Hernandez Ramirez added. And, if there is a question, documentation and technical support excel, he said: "It is the best documentation I have ever seen for scheduling. It also delves into project management problems, with real examples on earn value and schedule delays."
Overall, Hernandez Ramirez rated Primavera Project Planner (P3) a 9 out of 10.
Full Review
I have been using Primavera Project Planner (P3) for about seven years.
Suncor, which had revenue of about $18 billion last year, is involved in the oil and gas industry. The company was founded in 1967, and has grown rapidly over its 41-year history.
Suncor bought it directly from Primavera Systems Inc., the publisher of the software.
The company paid $2,500.
I use it for construction scheduling.
This tool was chosen by Suncor management for use within the company as a standard tool for construction scheduling. In my past experience, businesses chose this tool because of the software's rigidity to create and set baselines while offering a great deal of flexibility in order to manage several levels and the work breakdown structure (WBS). It also integrates easily and tightly with company ledgers.
No. For the purpose of cost-control we had to develop very simple routines in C++ to allocate cost at the Activity ID level. Such allocation was further broken into five major categories, which allowed us to see the cost at the various construction job-fronts exactly as each happened.
Yes, we checked into other programs that featured a lot of flexibility to create baselines and setting up WBS and cost breakdown structure (CBS), but this was perceived as a weakness rather than a strength.
We also used Microsoft Project management software and Primavera SureTrak.
I reckon that about 300 people use it here each day. The people doing the input and day-to-day tasks are cost schedulers and supervisors.
With my previous employer, Primavera Project Planner allowed us to standardize layouts across several projects so that, when we were looking at schedules, each project had the same format. Therefore, reporting became easier to do for those in charge of creating them; it was also easier for those reading project status reports and updates to understand them.
In my last project, a combined cycle power plant, we grew from 800 activities while the basic engineering phase was being executed, to more than 6,000 activities during the start-up and commissioning. It was always the same project and P3 managed it as such, allowing schedulers to add detail and activities as information became available.
Furthermore, in my first job as a scheduler engineer, we broke down the schedule of an oil platform project into smaller, more manageable projects that allowed us to optimize in isolation the execution of its parts, and then integrate each component back into the complete, much larger project each month. We were able to do this using the software's "fragnets" feature.
I don't feel able to respond.
The fact that an activities' identifications can be linked to job cost accounts in ledgers, so as to allow the merge of actual dollars with each activity on a monthly basis and evaluate the money burning rate vs. progress made, is very valuable to an organization's planning and budgeting processes.
Primavera Project Planner is the most expensive construction scheduling software that I have used, yet cost is not always related to quality. In this case, however, I believe the cost associated to develop such software is fair and so a couple of thousand of dollars very well is justified.
I'd reduce the price in order to have a larger base of users.
I feel that the resource-loading feature is not used much because the limitations on any project are set by the conditions encountered on construction job sites, not by the availability of resources.
I would recommend it to any company that requires scheduling software.
People need just basic knowledge of computing skills, but the user must understand what calculations are done when scheduling activities in projects. In doing so, the learning curve is shortened.
Training is a must for this tool, and while it usually has three levels, the third tier of training is not really needed for day-to-day construction project management activities because the course covers global changes and some advanced programming.
I had to call Primavera once when my computer crashed and the license was assigned to a broken PC. The support staff was very friendly and responded very quickly to my request.
It is the best documentation I have ever seen for construction scheduling software. It also delves into project management problems, with real examples on earn value and schedule delays.
It depends on the company's needs, I believe.
9
Company Overview
Seattle-based Dexter + Chaney Inc. specializes in construction accounting and construction project management software. The company was founded in 1981 and provides its software to clients throughout the United States. Dexter + Chaney has developed an integrated construction management software package called Spectrum Construction Software.
9700 Lake City Way NE
Seattle, WA
Web: dexterchaney.com
Find Software Tips
Latest reviews by topic
- Field Management (2)
- Imaging (6)
- Risk Analysis (3)
- Cost Estimating (37)
- CRM (8)
- Engineering/CAD (14)
- Job Cost Accounting (47)
- On Screen Takeoff (10)
- Project Management (81)
- Scheduling and Resourcing (50)
Latest reviews by industry
- Commercial (81)
- Concrete (37)
- Design/Build Firm (40)
- Electrical Contractor (41)
- Energy (Oil/Gas) (30)
- General Contracting (76)
- Government (56)
- Healthcare (35)
- Heavy and Highway (71)
- Industrial (76)
- Insurance (20)
- Landscape (24)
- Masonry (24)
- Mechanical Contractor (25)
- Mixed Use (70)
- New Construction (37)
- Plumbing Contractor (29)
- Repair/Remodeling (41)
- Residential (82)
- School (34)
- Subcontractor (39)
- Utilities (31)
